Share This

Google+ Badge


Those Who Deceive Must Be Revealed!




Thursday, January 31, 2013

Sandy Hook victims VS. Obama drones

Anti-Gun Advocates Heckle Woman Wanting to Defend Her Children

Cowboy Byte
January 30, 2013
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday on Capitol Hill about how to prevent gun violence, Senior Fellow of the Independent Women’s Forum Gayle Trotter was loudly heckled by anti-gun advocates in the crowd after she suggested women need firearms to protect young children in their homes. 


“An assault weapon in the hands of a young woman defending her babies at her home becomes a defense weapon,” Trotter said as jeers erupted. “Guns are the great equalizer during a violent confrontation.”
 198  61  32

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/18323/anti-gun-advocates-heckle-woman-wanting-to-defend-her-children-during-gun-violence-hearing/#ixzz2JbDcHnQK



Sunday Drive in SanFrancisco


Where did all the traffic go? Looks like fun.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Think the Obama Recovery was bad? Just wait until the Obama Recession!

SchiffReport

Obama Goes Shooting all the Time

January 30, 2013

This one should really say I shoot the Shit all the time when I am talking to the American public. Those suckers believe everything I say. What idiots. 

Photos from Ammoland.com
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/01/fake-photo-of-president-obama-skeet-shooting/#axzz2JPnPIYkO

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Obama to Top Brass: Will you fire on American Citizens?


Don't listen to what he says, watch what he does?

Journalist Accosted By Security Over Mayor Bloomberg Gun Control Question


Looks like Bloomberg doesn't have a problem with guns, just a problem with us citizens owning them. The elite feel like they are better then us all. How many body guards does this asshole really need. I don't think Obama has this many guards around him.

The 'Opium Brides' of Afghanistan

The Long War Journal
By 

Watch Opium Brides on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

A 2012 Frontline documentary covered portions of the child slavery trade associated with the opium trade and the Afghan government's selective campaign against opium farming. CNN recently interviewed the filmmakers, who assert that there are "hundreds, if not thousands of girls on the run from the traffickers."
For additional background on the fundamental challenges posed by Afghanistan's opium economy and government drug policy, see Long War Journal coverage from 2010: 'A counterinsurgency conundrum in Salaam Bazaar:'
[P]erhaps a majority of area residents are effectively indentured servants of the Taliban, beholden to insurgent drug lords through the credit system established by the Akhundzada family during their rule of Helmand in the 1980s and 1990s. Farmers receive start-up capital in the form of money, goods, and services that enable them to feed their families while cultivating a poppy crop. After the harvest, the borrowers owe a certain yield to the creditors, regardless of weather, the health of the crop, or other factors. If this debt is not repaid, the farmer falls further into debt or can be subject to beatings and even murder. The locals' resulting servile fear of the Taliban makes cooperation with Americans and the Afghan government security forces an untenable proposition.
Despite the risk of incarceration for locals who possess large amounts of the drug, opium cultivation remains a core element of Helmand's cultural and economic fabric. Poppy is relatively inexpensive to grow, in terms of the cost of seed and average crop yields per unit of water and land, and its cultivation has a guaranteed and well-understood net return. In addition, poppy is labor-intensive to harvest, employing large segments of the population; bricks of opium paste can be stored underground for up to five years without spoiling; and it can be used as cash in the local economy. Most crucially, opium farmers gain access to credit.
Because of the entrenched financing and trade infrastructure that has grown up around poppy cultivation, small farmers and sharecroppers can easily obtain credit and supplies from merchants, shop owners, and other businessmen, a debt paid back upon successful harvesting and delivery of the yield. This credit can be extended in the form of cash or services and goods, including basic necessities, like food. To an impoverished population often focused on immediate survival, small poppy farming to make ends meet makes sense, despite the illegality, taxation by the Taliban or corrupt government officials, and risk.
The UN has projected that other crops could offer greater profit margins: onions, pomegranates, and almonds are among the alternatives that could promise a higher net income. But despite Afghan government and ISAF programs to jumpstart these crops, the financing options are much more limited, storage and distribution networks are in their infancy or nonexistent, and farmers are skeptical about taking the risk into an unknown market. Many have demanded a guaranteed price for the alternate crops, which is generally considered a non-starter because it will create unsustainable dependencies.
The ties between the insurgency and the opium trade are simple: to the extent the government is unstable, drug lords and the illegal drug trade thrive. And to the extent the local population considers opium cultivation its best or only option, it will hesitate to support any force that threatens its livelihood. Farmers are considered amenable to alternate crops, but some civilian and military experts find that restructuring the local economy away from the drug trade is an intensive, generational aid project. These experts see it as requiring international assistance, especially through the expansion of microloans, the creation of local processing facilities, and widening regional trade with a focus on Afghanistan's neighbors, Pakistan and Iran.


Read more: http://www.longwarjournal.org/videos/2013/01/the_opium_brides_of_afghanista.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LongWarJournalSiteWide+%28The+Long+War+Journal+%28Site-Wide%29%29#ixzz2JPFqlsCD

A Warning from Australia to America : Don't Give Up Your Guns


This is what Frankenstein and Obama want. They hate our Constitution and the Second Amendment. Lose the Second and we lose the full Constitution. It can and will happen if we let Obama get his way.

Monday, January 28, 2013

UAE To Try Ninety-Four On Attempted Coup Charges; Says Group includes Ties To Muslim Brotherhood

The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report


Global media is reporting that the United Arab Emirates will try 94 people on charges of trying to seize power in that country. According to a BBC report, the UAE Attorney General said that the group had links to “foreigners” including the Muslim Brotherhood:
The United Arab Emirates has ordered 94 people to be tried on charges of trying to seize power. The attorney general said the suspects had formed a group that publicly called on people to observe the teachings and values of Islam, but in secret sought to overthrow the state. He said they had links to foreigners, including the Muslim Brotherhood. The UAE has arrested dozens of alleged dissidents, who have said they are victims of false accusations. Political parties and demonstrations are banned in the UAE. Links denied A statement from Attorney General Salem Saeed Kubaish said the suspects had used the media and social networking sites ‘to turn nationals [UAE citizens] against their government’. ‘They launched, established and ran an organisation seeking to oppose the basic principles of the UAE system of governance and to seize power,’ it said. It said the group raised money through property deals and religious contributions. Last year authorities detained more than 60 civil society activists, many connected to al-Islah, an Islamist group alleged by the government to have links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Al-Islah says it favours peaceful reform and denies links to the brotherhood. The crackdown has triggered complaints from human rights groups. The authorities have been accused of deporting and harassing human rights defenders, denying legal assistance to political detainees, and intimidating and deporting lawyers seeking to assist detainees.
Read the rest here
The New York Times reported in mid-January on the continuing conflict between the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. 
The GMBDR has extensively covered the ongoing developments concerning the Muslim Brotherhood in the Gulf countries:
  • post from earlier this month reported that that the UAE had arrested 10 people described as the leadership of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in that country. 
  •  A post from November 2012 reported on further comments by the Dubai police chief accusing the Muslim Brotherhood of creating unrest in the UAE. As noted in that post,  Lt. Gen. Dhahi Khalfan also said that UAE Muslim Brotherhood members who had been arrested had met with Kuwaiti Brotherhood “mentors”  including Kuwaiti Brotherhood leader Tariq Al-Suwaidan.
  • post from October 2012 reported on comments by the United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister in which he said that Gulf Arab countries should work together to stop the Muslim Brotherhood from undermining governments in the area. 
  • post from late September 2012 reported that the Muslim Brotherhood in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had denied setting up an armed wing with the goal of seizing power. A post from late September reported on the trial in Abu Dhabi of what are described as “activists belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood” and who reportedly admitted that they have engaged in financial actives and communicated with “the international organisation of the Muslim Brotherhood and other bodies.” 
  • post from April 2012 reported that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had detained six members of the local Muslim Brotherhood whose citizenship had been revoked on the basis of belonging to groups that fund terrorists. Earlier posts reported on allegations by the Dubai police chief that the Muslim Brotherhood is using social media to attack the UAE and his threat to arrest Qaradawi who criticized the UAE for revoking the visas of Syrians demonstrating against the regime in Damascus.\
  •  In March 2012, a post reported that that Tariq Al-Suwaidan had added his voice to the conflict between the UAE and the Global Muslim Brotherhood by warning that if the UAE followed through on its threat to arrest Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi, “it would be a disaster” for the UAE. 

Bernanke to Oprah: "I've Been Doping for Years"

SchiffReport

Lets See How Smart You Are





Subject: DEMENTIA QUIZ

THIS MAY BE A "Little" DIFFICULT FOR ALL WHO ARE OVER 60 .THOSE YOUNGER THAN THIS WILL HAVE NO HOPE AT ALL.
DEMENTIA QUIZ



FIRST QUESTION:

YOU ARE A PARTICIPANT IN A RACE. YOU OVERTAKE
THE SECOND PERSON. WHAT POSITION ARE YOU IN?





~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~






ANSWER : IF YOU ANSWERED THAT YOU ARE FIRST,
THEN YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG! IF YOU OVERTAKE THE
SECOND PERSON AND YOU TAKE HIS PLACE, YOU ARE IN SECOND PLACE!

TRY TO DO BETTER NEXT TIME.
NOW ANSWER THE SECOND QUESTION,
BUT DON'T TAKE AS MUCH TIME AS
YOU TOOK FOR THE FIRST QUESTION, OK?




SECOND QUESTION:
IF YOU OVERTAKE THE LAST PERSON, THEN YOU ARE....?
(SCROLL DOWN)




~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~





ANSWER: IF YOU ANSWERED THAT YOU ARE SECOND TO LAST, THEN YOU ARE.....
WRONG AGAIN. TELL ME SUNSHINE, HOW CAN YOU OVERTAKE THE LAST PERSON??


YOU'RE NOT VERY GOOD AT THIS, ARE YOU?

THIRD QUESTION:
VERY TRICKY ARITHMETIC! NOTE:
THIS MUST BE DONE IN YOUR HEAD ONLY.
DO NOT USE PAPER AND PENCIL OR A CALCULATOR.
TRY IT.

TAKE 1000 AND ADD 40 TO IT. NOW ADD ANOTHER 1000 NOW ADD 30.
ADD ANOTHER 1000. NOW ADD 20 .. NOW ADD ANOTHER 1000.
NOW ADD 10. WHAT IS THE TOTAL?


SCROLL DOWN FOR THE CORRECT ANSWER.....




~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~




DID YOU GET 5000?

THE CORRECT ANSWER IS ACTUALLY 4100...



IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IT, CHECK IT WITH A CALCULATOR!
TODAY IS DEFINITELY NOT YOUR DAY, IS IT?

MAYBE YOU'LL GET THE LAST QUESTION RIGHT.... MAYBE...



FOURTH QUESTION:
MARY'S FATHER HAS FIVE DAUGHTERS:

1. NANA, 2. NENE, 3. NINI, 4.. NONO, AND ???
2 WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE FIFTH DAUGHTER?



~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~



DID YOU ANSWER NUNU? NO! OF COURSE IT ISN'T.
HER NAME IS MARY! READ THE QUESTION AGAIN!





OKAY, NOW THE BONUS ROUND,
I.E., A FINAL CHANCE TO
REDEEM YOURSELF:


A MUTE PERSON GOES INTO A SHOP AND WANTS TO BUY A TOOTHBRUSH.
BY IMITATING THE ACTION OF BRUSHING HIS TEETH HE
SUCCESSFULLY EXPRESSES HIMSELF TO THE SHOPKEEPER AND THE PURCHASE IS DONE.
NEXT, A BLIND MAN COMES INTO THE SHOP WHO WANTS TO BUY A
PAIR OF SUNGLASSES; HOW DOES HE INDICATE WHAT HE WANTS?




~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~



IT'S REALLY VERY SIMPLE
HE OPENS HIS MOUTH AND ASKS FOR IT...
DOES YOUR EMPLOYER ACTUALLY PAY YOU TO THINK??
IF SO DO NOT LET THEM SEE YOUR ANSWERS FOR THIS TEST!


~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~


PASS THIS ON TO FRUSTRATE THE
SMART PEOPLE IN YOUR LIFE!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com/ Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/5508 - Release Date: 01/03/13 19:34:00





Police Chief Vows To Stop “Tyrannical Thugs” From Disarming Americans


(Youtube) – Gilberton, Pennsylvania Police Chief Mark Kessler promises not to enforce unconstitutional laws that eviscerate second amendment rights.
“I will take my uniform off and I will stand with freedom before I stand with tyrannical thugs.”
Speaking about disarmament after Hurricane Katrina: “The oath that these thugs took, they violated their oath, they’re thugs, nothing more than thugs and they disgust me.”

Sunday, January 27, 2013

"Child Killers of America"

EDL Are you going to let England die ?

Biden on Gun Control


Keep talking Joe. And why are you calling a semi automatic an assault weapon? The longer Biden talks the more dumb he looks. But we all know what a dumb shit he really is. Joe claims a shotgun is more effective against an intruder. What if there are more then one and you miss with your first shot or second? Most hunting shotguns must be plugged so they can only be loaded with three shells.Imagine trying to reload a shotgun as compared to holding a weapon that has ten rounds or more. Both can do the job if in the hands of someone trained. Biden fails to mention that even some shotguns are going to be banned if Frankensteins plans are ever passed. What Biden and his cohorts really want are a ban on all weapons. Total confiscation eventually. Once they have that data base on all the honest citizens that have weapons, you can bet the next step will be to impliment a registration fee for each gun you own. Fail to pay that yearly fee and you will be required to turn your guns in. Violate a law, even a driving law, you will be required to turn in your guns. This can and will happen if we remain silent. These liberal jackasses want your guns. They want to control ever aspect of your life. 

Sylvester Stallone Is A Freaking Hypocrite

Franklin Co Indiana Passes 2nd Amendment Preservation Act

Deadly Brazil fire video: 'Kiss' nightclub blaze kills over 200 in Santa Maria


Wouldn't you think that after so many died in this blaze, Brazil would mandate that all night clubs will be closed immediately. We cannot allow such weapons of mass destruction to continue to remain open.

"What Difference Does It Make?" - aka "The Hillary Shuffle"


It make a great deal of difference. Trying to hide the truth from Americans makes a great deal of difference. Denying the truth to the families of those four men who died when they pleaded many times for more security makes a big difference. Accept the fact Hillary, you Fuxxed up bigtime. It wasn't your superiors that are now on a paid leave of absence who are to blame. The buck stops at your desk. You can't shove the guilt under a rug. Benghazi wasn't an embassy in vienna or some place where violence wouldn't be expected. Benghazi was in Libya where violence was taking place on a daily basis. Other countries had pulled their people out but you Hillary let Stevens remain their to die. His blood and the blood of the other three brave souls is and always will be on your hands.

"Inauguration 2013: A Bad Lip Reading: — A Bad Lip Reading of Barack Obama'


Actually this rendition is much better then the original piece of Bullcrap we heard from this jackass.  

The Second Amendment is Not about Hunting

American Thinker
January 27, 2013


First things first: the Second Amendment to the Constitution is simple and clear.  The version of it that was ratified by the states reads as follows:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Following the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, President Obama and a host of senators and congressmen launched an all-out assault on so-called "assault weapons", high-capacity magazines, and gun ownership in general.  A few days ago, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed sweeping gun control legislation.  At the signing ceremony, he said,
"I am proud to be part of this government, not just because New York has the first bill, but because New York has the best bill.... I'm proud to be a New Yorker because New York is doing something - because we are fighting back."
Others had a different perspective.  According to the New York Times,
Gun-rights advocates denounced the measure. The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association said New York gun owners "should be ashamed and afraid of our state," and the National Rifle Association said, "These gun-control schemes have failed in the past and will have no impact on public safety and crime."
Ordinary people feel helpless and afraid when they see gruesome images of senseless mass shootings, and they wonder if they and members of their families will be next.  Their feelings are understandable, but as many of us have pointed out, guns are not the problem.  In every case where mass shootings have occurred, the person using the gun was the problem.  Despite Governor Cuomo's euphoria, banning guns of any type and/or restricting magazine capacity will do nothing to solve that problem.  In fact, a Harvard study indicates that restricting guns only makes the problem worse:
The study, which just appeared in Volume 30, Number 2 of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (pp. 649-694), set out to answer the question in its title: "Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence." Contrary to conventional wisdom, and the sniffs of our more sophisticated and generally anti-gun counterparts across the pond, the answer is "no." And not just no, as in there is no correlation between gun ownership and violent crime, but an emphatic no, showing a negative correlation: as gun ownership increases, murder and suicide decreases.
Even so, yesterday thousands of our fellow citizens marched in Washington to support gun control legislation for the nation as a whole.  They were not completely uninformed, but they were not well-informed, either.  If they understood the problem, they would realize that the best defense against armed attackers is armed citizens.  That's exactly what the evidence tells us, but pandering politicians being what they are can't resist the opportunity to capitalize on an opportunity, and the Sandy Hook massacre gave them one.  As Ben Shapiro said so eloquently, they and their enablers in the media, people like CNN's Piers Morgan, are "standing on the graves of children of Sandy Hook" to advance their political agendas.
Since ours is a constitutional form of government, as citizens we have a duty to delve deeply into the rationale of our Founding Fathers who risked their lives and property to win for us the freedoms that we enjoy, freedoms that are spelled out in our Constitution, before we enact legislation that restricts those freedoms in any way.  With that thought in mind, let's take a look at what some of them said about our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms:
George Washington: "Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence ... from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peacesecurity and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable ... the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."
Thomas Jefferson: "Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
George Mason, co-author of the Second Amendment : "I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
Our Founding Fathers' perspectives are just as important and relevant today as they were more than 200 years ago because the nature of man hasn't changed over time.  The world is still full of people who would enslave us and compel us to do their bidding if they could.  Our nation's capital is still loaded with elected officials who believe they know what's best for the rest of us, and they are willing to use whatever force is necessary to subjugate us and make us fall into line behind their way of thinking even if it violates our constitutional rights. 
As a current case in point, seemingly innocuous healthcare legislation that was proposed by the president, passed by Congress, and approved by the Supreme Court is running roughshod over our religious freedoms that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.  Reasonable people can easily conclude that they would do much more to violate our rights if they could, that is if we would let them.  As unappealing as this possibility is, the day may come when we will need our weapons to fend off an overreaching and tyrannical government, as our Founding Fathers knew could happen.
Unfortunately, President Obama doesn't get it even though he is reputed to be a constitutional scholar.  Evidence of that fact can be found in an interview that he gave to The New Republic a few days ago.  The president said,
...I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations. And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake.
Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas. And if you grew up and your dad gave you a hunting rifle when you were ten, and you went out and spent the day with him and your uncles, and that became part of your family's traditions, you can see why you'd be pretty protective of that.
So it's trying to bridge those gaps that I think is going to be part of the biggest task over the next several months. And that means that advocates of gun control have to do a little more listening than they do sometimes.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting, and it's not about where we live.  It's about our right to defend ourselves if/when the need arises as our Founding Fathers made perfectly clear.

Neil Snyder is the Ralph A. Beeton Professor Emeritus at the University of Virginia.  His blog, SnyderTalk.com, is posted daily.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/01/the_second_amendment_is_not_about_hunting_1.html#ixzz2JC9AOx4u
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Ridiculing religion: Comedian debates Muslims (Hans Teeuwen).


Why did they want him to lie down? I wouldn't trust any bagheads even on a tv show. Its nice to see someone with the guts to make fun of what is really an evil ideology. Yes Muslims do fuck their goats and as we have seen sometimes even their horses. Wasn't long ago one of these savages was sentenced for killing his horse in a vial way after the horse kicked him when he was trying to fuxx the horse. Sorry folks, but Islam is a sick ideology. Look at the middle east. Everywhere Muslims live, we see death and destruction.
Heck watch the film, he even had these bagheads laughing.  

Video warns Obama: People Will Fight to Keep Guns

January 27, 2013

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Mrs Brown's Mischievous Call

Skokie School District 68 adding Muslim holiday this fall

Skokie Review

Updated: January 24, 2013 5:41AM
Skokie School District 68’s 2013-14 calendar for the first time calls for a day off on Eid ul Adha, a major Muslim holiday.
Not long ago, adopting a school calendar for the following year was perfunctory for Niles Township school districts, but not anymore. The village’s growing ethnic diversity has inspired more districts to break away from old patterns.
The township used to be heavily Jewish and many of its schools closed down only for high Jewish holidays and a few others like Good Friday.
Neighboring Skokie School District 73.5, though, was one of the first township districts to recognize the area’s demographic change in deciding on its calendar. That district’s school board made the controversial decision — at least at the time — to remain open for all religious holidays, sparking an annual lively debate.
More districts have followed District 73.5’s lead, even if remaining open on all religious holidays results in certain heavy non-attendance days.
By religious holidays does this mean this school district doesn't take off for the winter holidays season? Or perhaps the Spring break season formally known as the Christmas and Easter Holidays? 
District 68, the largest elementary school district in Skokie, has not yet taken that path, but naming Eid ul Adha a day off signals a big change.
“This was the first year I’ve been approached by a parent as to why we take two Jewish days off and no Muslim day off,” District 68 Superintendent Frances McTague said.
The latest school report card from the state shows that nearly 73 percent of District 68 students are not white, and more than 32 percent are Asian.
Under the approved district calendar for next school year, classes will begin Aug. 21 and end June 3, 2014 if no make-up days are needed. In addition to Eid ul Adha on Oct. 15, the district will close for Rosh Hashanah Sept. 5 and Good Friday April 18, 2014.
District 68 for the first time is also considering adopting a 2014-15 calendar soon, thereby beginning a pattern of planning two-year calendars at a time.
“Lots of school districts are adopting two-year calendars now,” McTague said. “This next year though will be a little more challenging.”
That’s because more religious holidays fall on school days and Niles Township High School District 219 is beginning its calendar in 2014-15 earlier than before. The feeder elementary school districts have always taken into account the high school district’s calendar.
The District 68 Board last week discussed waiving three usual days off in the 2014-15 calendar: Veterans Day, Presidents Day and Casimir Pulaski Day. The state allows districts to get waivers to stay open for those holidays although District 68 has never done so before.
Don't count on the teachers having to work on these former holidays. Once they get  any benefit, they don't give it back. lol
The District 68 School Board could vote on a 2014-15 calendar in February.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Diane "Hitler" Mao" Stalin"Feinstein Is Coming For Your Guns


If you know your history you would support the Second Amendment.

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke's PSA : We're partners now

Congressman: “Obama Only Upholds The Soviet Constitution”


January 24, 2013
(SteveWatson) – Georgia congressman Paul Broun hit out this week at his favourite target, President Obama, stating that he has no concept of the US Constitution.
In an interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Broun, a frequent critic of Obama noted “I think my role is to uphold support and defend our Constitution.”
“The Constitution I uphold and defend is the one I carry in my pocket all the time, the U.S. Constitution,” Broun added.
“I don’t know what Constitution that other members of Congress uphold, but it’s not this one. I think the only Constitution that Barack Obama upholds is the Soviet constitution, not this one. He has no concept of this one, though he claimed to be a constitutional lawyer.” the Congressman also said.
Congressman Broun has been a thorn in the side of Obama’s agenda since day one.
In 2009 he warned attendees of a town hall event that the Obama administration wasplanning to use a pandemic or a natural disaster to implement martial law in the United States.
Speaking at the North Georgia Technical College auditorium, Broun said that the “socialistic elite,” as well as Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, were planning to exploit a crisis to create a favorable climate for their stalling political agenda.
“They’re trying to develop an environment where they can take over,” he said. “We’ve seen that historically.”
He also spoke out against Obama’s plan to create a “national civilian security force,” warning that the program sounded like a 21st century Gestapo and that it was part of a move towards a Marxist dictatorship.
“That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”
Broun also cited the threat to the second amendment posed by the Obama administration and anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder.
“We can’t be lulled into complacency,” Broun said. “You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I’m not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I’m saying is there is the potential of going down that road.”
As a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Broun has also been heavilycritical of the TSA. In recent weeks he has sought to “pick up right where Congressman [Ron] Paul left off” by reintroducing “Audit the Fed” legislation for the current session of Congress.
Source: Infowars

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Rand Paul to John Kerry: If it was wrong to bomb Cambodia without Congress’s approval, why is bombing Libya without approval okay?

Hot Air
January 24, 2013

Excellent, and not just the Libya stuff. Stick with it for Paul’s questions about how smart it is to be arming the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt when Morsi is already wheezing about Jews controlling the media in official diplomatic sessions with the U.S. If you’re wondering why it fell to Paul to ask this question instead of any of the more senior senators who preceded him, it’s because the Senate was perfectly happy to have Obama act unilaterally on Libya. The Iraq war authorization came back to haunt many of them; no one knew at the time how messy Libya might get. O did them a favor, left and right, by freeing them from a tough vote. But Kerry can’t say that so instead he squirms through a few minutes of how the two bombing campaigns are different because they just are. Frankly, Paul let him off easy. You could, if you chose, defend U.S. actions in Cambodia as a cross-border extension of the war already being fought in Vietnam. No such defense for Libya; if anything, the Libya war cut against the AUMF against Al Qaeda that was passed after 9/11 because, as we’ve recently learned, eliminating Qadaffi was actually a boon to jihadist groups like AQ.
My one criticism of Paul here is his failure to press Kerry on his proferred excuse, that Obama had no time to ask Congress for action because Qadaffi was about to put thousands of Libyan rebels in Benghazi to the sword. Nonsense. Go look at the timeline leading up to the west’s military intervention. Protests against Qadaffi broke out in mid-February; by February 21, Libyan diplomats were asking the UN for a no-fly zone. A day later Hillary was issuing public statements denouncing Qaddafi and by March 1 the Senate had passed a non-binding resolution — unanimously — encouraging the UN to impose that no-fly zone. It wasn’t until March 15, however, that NFZ was finally approved and not until March 19 that France, backed by the U.S., began an air campaign over the country. Obama had nearly an entire month in which he could have asked for congressional approval but Kerry wants you to believe that his decision was made under some sort of emergency conditions, a la an invasion or nuclear attack, where the president had no choice logistically but to act on his own. Pitiful. He’ll be confirmed with 95+ votes anyway.

Rand Paul: Disturbing No One Lost Their Job Over 9/11 and Benghazi - Fox Business 1/23/2013

The Financial Armageddon
Sen. Rand Paul, (R-Ky.), talks to Fox Business Network's Neil Cavuto about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's testimony on the Benghazi attack. A manager from McDonald could do a better job than Hillary -- Rand nailed it- she has totally mismanaged the department! Anyone with half a brain would realize that security concerns via a cable message from a hot spot is a priority! Not reading it is no excuse !! That is why there are directors to put systems in place, keep staff advised over what is priority and what should be brought to her attention. Talk about hiding behind bureaucracy!! Incompetence -- totally!!


Glock Demonstrates That Gun Ownership is Not Just a Right, But a Necessity

Obama Litmus Test For Military Leaders-Will You Fire On US Citizens? Read more: http://patriotoutdoornews.com/5155/obama-tailoring-military-leadership-to-only-those-who-will-shoot-fellow-americans#ixzz2Iw8OD360

January 23, 2013

Dr. Garrow is not known for being a wild crackpot or part of the political fringe, so when he recently made the following post on his Facebook page, it got the attention of a number people:
“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test’ in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. ‘The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.’ Those who will not are being removed.”
When asked who is source was, Garrow replied:
“The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”


Read more: http://patriotoutdoornews.com/5155/obama-tailoring-military-leadership-to-only-those-who-will-shoot-fellow-americans#ixzz2Iw8ahuP0

Obama Supporters on Climate Bill Costs: No Thanks!

SchiffReport

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Muslim Patrol: London Sharia vigilantes condemned

Ted Nugent Ready for Armed Revolt Against Evil Obama

Biderman's Daily Edge: The arrogance of the Obama Administration is pointing to failure

Clinton Shouts: ‘What Difference Would It Make?’

Conservative Byte.com
January 23, 2012
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked about ascertaining whether the Benghazi terror attack was the result of a protest by Senator Ron Johnson. “What difference would it make?” Clinton shouted, seemingly losing her cool.




Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/01/clinton-shouts-what-difference-would-it-make/#ixzz2IqSnyRXh


Losing her cool. More like losing her mind. She knows she fuxxed up bigtime. She knows she helped with a coverup. So what difference would it make if she finally told the truth? This is how liberals think. They lie and lie again and think its just fine. The coverup was to protect Obama prior to the election. Imagine if it was a Republican saying What difference would it make. The media would be all over her. 

Wayne Lapierre Major Response to Obama's Socialist Inagural Address

Britain: Immigration Seen as Top Problem

Gatestone Institute
by Soeren Kern
January 23, 2013 at 5:00 am



There are roughly 863,000 people living illegally in Britain, of whom 604,000 (70%) live in London. — London School of Economics
Britons' view immigration as the biggest problem facing their society, according to a flurry of new surveys and research reports about the current state of affairs in Britain.
Taken together, the data highlights the widening gulf between the views of British voters, who are increasingly skeptical about uncontrolled immigration and the dangerous divisions it is creating in their society, and those of the governing elite who run the country, many of whom remain committed to the idea of building a multicultural society.
A new report, "State of the Nation: Where is Bittersweet Britain Heading?," shows that one in three Britons believes that tension between immigrants and people born in Britain is the primary cause of conflict in the country, and well over half regard it as one of the top three causes.
The survey, conducted by the Ipsos MORI research firm and published by the London-based think tank British Future on January 14, also shows that respect for the law, for the freedom of speech of others, and an ability to speak English are viewed as the three most essential traits of being a Briton.
In addition, the report shows that a high proportion of British voters are pessimistic about the British economy (50%), and three-fourths believe there is a severe housing shortage, due in large measure to uncontrolled immigration. More than half (56%) say the current economic crisis will leave Britain weaker for years to come and nearly half (46%) say Britain is heading in the wrong direction.
The findings mirror the results of the British Social Attitudes Survey, an official study conducted annually, which polls Britons on their attitudes about a number of social issues.
The 2012 edition of the survey shows that Britons are far more strongly opposed to immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, than they have been at any time in recent memory. The document states that 75% of Britons would like to see a reduction in immigration, and that 51% would like to see a large reduction. Moreover, 52% of respondents believe that immigration has a negative economic impact, and 48% believe that it has a negative cultural impact.
The report notes: "The period since the late-1990s has seen the largest inflow of immigrants to Britain in history…. A decade of high migration levels, and prominent political debates about the effects of immigration, have not been well-received by the British public. Despite the hard economic times, it also seems that it is concerns about culture which have risen the most over the decade."
The survey also shows that negative sentiment about immigration is not limited to the white British majority population: over one quarter of first and second generation migrants believe that mass immigration has had a negative impact on British society.
A separate report, "Practical Measures for Reducing Irregular Migration," written by researchers at the London School of Economics (LSE), estimates there are roughly 863,000 people living illegally in Britain, of whom 604,000 (70%) live in London.
The LSE report says that it is, by definition, hard to be exact about the numbers involved. Illegal residents comprise those who entered the country illegally and those who have overstayed, having entered legally. The authors of the report believe that the majority of illegal residents fall into the latter category.
Over the past two decades, those entering the country have exceeded those leaving by more than 100,000 in every year since 1998.
Prime Minister David Cameron has pledged to get net migration -- the difference between the number of people entering Britain and those leaving -- down to the "tens of thousands" before the general election in May 2015.
Despite repeated pledges to reduce immigration, in practice Cameron has found it difficult to take meaningful steps to address the issue. Although the Conservative half of his coalition government is solidly in favor of reducing immigration, the Liberal Democrat half is not. As a result, the government has been effectively paralyzed in taking forceful action on the issue.
Data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in November 2012 showed that net migration fell to 183,000 in the 12 months leading to March 2012, down from 242,000 the previous year -- but nowhere near the targets that have been set by Cameron.
A new study, "Migration Review 2012/13," produced by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), predicts that net migration will fall to 140,000 in 2013, but will then rise again in 2014 as the government runs out of options for restricting the number of foreign nationals entering Britain.
All sides agree that the current decline in net migration is being driven by lower numbers of international students from outside the European Union (EU).
The issue of students from outside the EU is currently a hot topic in Britain, with increasing concern about the numbers of foreign students who study and then do not leave.
According to MigrationWatch UK, an independent think tank that focuses on immigration and asylum issues, about 250,000 foreign students from outside the EU arrive every year to study in Britain. About one in five stays on legally after completing all studies and becomes a long-term immigrant, while the others return home. But because there are no exit checks, the number who actually left the country is unknown. It is believed that those who stay illegally far outnumber those who stay legally.
In September 2012, the British government announced that the ONS would begin counting non-EU students as immigrants as part of an effort to keep closer tabs foreigners entering and leaving the country.
recent poll commissioned by MigrationWatch shows that 70% of those surveyed believe there should be a limit on the number of foreign students admitted to Britain.
The survey shows strong support from across the political spectrum for a limit: 70% of Conservatives, 66% of Labour and 57% of Liberal Democrats are in favor of a limit. The strongest support is in Scotland at 76%, while the lowest is in London at 62%. Women are more likely than men to favor a limit by 74% to 67%.
The poll also shows strong support for action against bogus students, whose real motive is to work illegally and send money home. Of those surveyed, 70% say that those found to have insufficient English for their courses should be deported; 84% believe that those found to be working rather than studying should be deported; and 87% think that those who overstay their visas after their courses have finished should be deported.
A recent crackdown on foreign students has led to British border agents conducting interviews with student-visa applicants from "high-risk" countries. In addition, a new inspection regime to ensure that colleges are legitimate has already led to the closure of more than 100 bogus schools.
But the government has also faced criticism for damaging business and universities by making it harder for non-EU nationals to come to Britain to study.
British Immigration Minister Mark Harper has blamed the immigration problems on the previous Labour government, in power between 1997 and 2010. He said: "It's no surprise that after years of uncontrolled immigration, we have a sizeable illegal immigrant population in Britain. We are determined to get immigration under control and in the past year, net migration has fallen by a quarter."
But Britain is now facing a new immigration challenge. Under the EU's "freedom of movement" rules, beginning on January 1, 2014, a new wave of citizens from Eastern Europe will gain the right to live and work unrestrictedly in Britain. Bulgarians and Romanians -- so-called "A2" nationals, totaling 29 million in all -- have had restricted rights to come to Britain, as they joined the EU in 2007, but those limits will end on December 31, 2013.
An estimated 150,000 A2 nationals are already living in Britain, and some British MPs have forecast that as many as 300,000 more immigrants from Bulgaria and Romania, the poorest countries in the EU, could enter Britain in 2014 alone.
Speaking to the BBC's Sunday Politics show on January 13, Eric Pickles, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, acknowledged the looming problem. He said: "Given that we've got a housing shortage, any influx from Romania and Bulgaria is going to cause problems. It's going to cause problems not just in terms of the housing market but also on the social housing market."
Separately, the latest tranche of data from Britain's 2011 Census, released in December 2012, shows that England and Wales experienced their greatest-ever population growth (7.1%) in any 10-year period since 1800. Much of this increase is due to immigration.
In real terms, 13% (or 7.5 million) of the population of England and Wales was born abroad. Of that number, 3.8 million arrived between 2001 and 2011. In other words, most of the immigrants living in England and Wales today arrived within the past 10 years.
The census data also showed that Islam is by far the fastest growing religion in Britain. The Muslim population in England and Wales increased by 80% (1.2 million), from 1.5 million in 2001 to 2.7 million in 2011, making it the second-largest religion in Britain.
According to official projections compiled by the ONS, the population of Britain is on course to reach 70 million in less than 15 years. ONS data says the population is set to rise from 62.3 million in 2010 to 67.2 million by 2020 to 70 million in 2027 and 73.2 million by 2035.
The ONS says two-thirds of the projected increase from 2010 to 2035 is either directly or indirectly due to immigration. This will be due to people entering Britain, and also their future offspring.
MPs at the House of Commons recently passed a motion calling for the coalition government to take "all necessary steps" to keep the population of Britain below 70 million.
Speaking at the Parliament, Conservative MP Nicholas Soames said: "We would see a population increase of 7.7 million people, nearly 5 million of whom would be purely as a result of new immigrants and their children. Numbers of that kind are hard to grasp, so let me put it like this: in the coming 15 years, just for new immigrants and their families, we will have to build the equivalent of eight of the largest cities outside the capital -- Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, Sheffield, Bradford, Bristol and Glasgow -- together with the associated social infrastructure of schools, roads, hospitals, railways and all the rest."
Soames also blamed the previous Labour government for its "chaotic, ill-thought out and deeply irresponsible approach to immigration." Under its watch, Soames said, Britain had witnessed "the greatest wave of immigration ... in nearly 1,000 years."
Meanwhile, a survey published by the Extremis Project, a group that monitors populist politics, found that more than half (66%) of British voters would be willing to back a party that promised to "prioritize traditional British values over other cultures."
The poll found that 41% of people would vote for a party that promised to curb all immigration, and more than one-third (37%) would support political parties that promised to reduce the number of Muslims in Britain and the presence of Islam in society.
In a major speech on integration, hosted by British Future and Policy Exchange on January 15, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said it is essential that immigrants learn English. He said that millions of people living in Britain were closed off from society because of a lack of literacy, and he unveiled a £6 million ($9.5 million) fund to encourage projects to help non-speakers learn the language, as it will help them "improve their circumstances and climb the social ladder."